I am writing in response to Chris Moss’s horribly inaccurate and ultimately dangerous Rock Climbing Vs Ice Climbing feature from the Guardian Weekend (February 9th2008, Page 28). The general gist of the piece is a blow by blow comparison of which is a better workout for you, rock or ice? Moss’s conclusion is that ice climbing is “(A)n almost unrivalled exercise in providing a complete workout, pushing every part of your body. Ice is harder so expect even firmer, more defined muscles, less fat and better contours”. What Moss fails to note is how unhealthy ice climbing, at least in Britain, really is. No personal trainer would recommend less sleep, more junk food and spending hours sitting in the cold holding a rope to get more defined muscles. Ice climbing seems to help you justify to yourself eating lots of shit, especially as it feels like dinner time by lunch. Furthermore the whole culture of mountaineering seems to be passionately anti-athletic surrounded by peer pressure to drink more and avoid anything that could be perceived as training. With the obesity epidemic the developed world has on its hands it seems unlikely that ice climbing is any sort of solution.
On the flip side if everyone became a sport climber we’d all have bronzed bodies from climbing in Spain, be borderline anorexic, have a training addiction and a willingness to push ourselves harder without having to worry about a death fall, just pulley injuries. Everyone would be happy and ripped and the season would last more than 4 weeks spread over 3 months.
On the flip side if everyone became a sport climber we’d all have bronzed bodies from climbing in Spain, be borderline anorexic, have a training addiction and a willingness to push ourselves harder without having to worry about a death fall, just pulley injuries. Everyone would be happy and ripped and the season would last more than 4 weeks spread over 3 months.

Got an ice axe...

got a stick-clip.